International Bank of Commerce: Laredo’s cross-border banking flagship

The name is shared; the charter is specific

International Bank of Commerce in Laredo is the institution with FDIC certificate 19629. The current directory lists it as an active Texas state-chartered bank that is not a Federal Reserve member, with the FDIC as its primary federal supervisor. Its establishment date is September 2, 1966. This profile follows that charter. Other banks with the same legal name operate in Brownsville, Zapata and Oklahoma City, so a reference to the IBC brand alone is insufficient to identify the balance sheet being discussed. [1]

The bank’s official overview describes the Laredo institution as the flagship of International Bancshares Corporation. The parent owns five banking subsidiaries, including another Laredo bank with a different name, and markets services across Texas and Oklahoma. Its founding in a border city remains important to the story: the franchise combines ordinary household and business banking with customers and commercial relationships that cross the U.S.–Mexico border. Group branch counts and group assets consequently should not be assigned to the Laredo charter as though the subsidiaries were one insured bank. [2]

A local lender with an international customer base

The 2025 Form 10-K describes the subsidiaries’ services as checking and savings, commercial and real-estate loans, consumer credit, mortgages, letters of credit and foreign exchange. Small and midsized businesses have historically been central, alongside growing retail activity. The filing also says customers domiciled in Mexico supplied about 32% of deposits across the subsidiary banks at year-end 2025. That is a group-wide funding statistic, not a measured percentage for certificate 19629. The distinction prevents a plausible business description from turning into an invented bank-specific concentration. [3]

Cross-border deposits can connect banking to family wealth, business trade and confidence in dollar accounts. The same filing identifies a corresponding risk: tariffs, weaker Mexican economic activity or strained bilateral relations could affect deposit balances and customers’ ability to repay. The issue is therefore broader than exchange rates. A domestically chartered bank can have material exposure to international customer behavior even when its branches and legal charter are American. This is the company’s stated risk framework, not a finding that depositors have begun to leave. [3]

The bank-only June checkpoint

Between the June checkpoints, the Laredo bank’s assets grew 4.8% and deposits 0.9%, while net loans increased 10.5%. Net loans exceeded deposits in June 2026, making equity and other balance-sheet funding important to the picture. Reported real-estate-secured lending was $5.87 billion, including $1.75 billion of construction and development loans. These are bank-only figures. The table is in millions; income and net charge-offs cover each first half, while all other entries are June 30 balances. A small loss figure alone does not describe all potential credit exposure. [4]

Noncurrent loans and leases are at least 90 days overdue or no longer accruing interest. [5]

Scroll horizontally to see all columns.

Earnings at the bank and at the parent

International Bancshares Corporation’s August 6 quarterly filing reported $17.02 billion of consolidated assets and first-half net income of $198.0 million. These figures exceed the Laredo bank’s corresponding amounts because the corporate group includes the other subsidiaries. The filing identifies the Laredo bank separately among the subsidiaries included in those consolidated accounts. Keeping those reporting levels apart is particularly useful here: a group-level description of strong capital or abundant deposits does not by itself establish how funding, earnings and assets are distributed among its individual banks. [6]

A bank that expands lending faster than deposits has several possible ways to fund the difference, including retained earnings, existing liquid assets or other liabilities. The two June reports establish the change, but do not prove which customer decisions drove every dollar. Likewise, construction lending is not automatically troubled lending: repayment can depend on finishing, selling or refinancing projects, and the public totals do not reveal each project’s completion status. That makes portfolio composition informative while leaving borrower-level conclusions beyond what this snapshot can support. [7]

Ownership context and a carefully scoped enforcement record

The Federal Reserve’s May 2026 report on minority depository institutions includes the Laredo bank in its year-end 2024 inventory, identifies it as Hispanic American and distinguishes it from the similarly named sister banks. That classification is about the institution’s ownership or governance criteria within the program. It is not a credit rating, a deposit guarantee beyond ordinary FDIC rules, or evidence that its customers all share the same background. It adds institutional context to the bank’s longstanding border-market role without replacing the financial evidence. [8]

A separate FDIC decision dated January 17, 2025 prohibited a former international sales representative, Martin Fernandez Jr., from further participation in insured banking without the required permissions. The Board adopted a default decision concerning unauthorized transfers from customer accounts and noted his guilty plea to theft. This was an individual prohibition involving an institution-affiliated party of the Laredo bank, not an order declaring the bank insolvent or placing an asset cap on the group. It is relevant to operational-control history precisely because the person, institution and scope can be identified. [9]

The overall picture is a profitable, well-established border-market franchise with more than one source of risk. Property lending connects results to local development and collateral values; international relationships connect funding to confidence and cross-border economic activity; operational controls matter alongside both. The retained records do not provide customer-level concentrations, every loan’s collateral coverage or a comprehensive history of all regulatory interactions. Subsequent bank filings and specific supervisory disclosures could clarify those questions. The present evidence supports analysis of a distinct Laredo charter, rather than treating the entire IBC network as one bank. [7]

Sources

1. FDIC current institution record, certificate 19629; retrieved October 6, 2026Official sourceBack to text: ↑
2. IBC official group and subsidiary overview, checked October 6, 2026SourceBack to text: ↑
3. International Bancshares 2025 Form 10-K, filed February 26, 2026Filing / reportBack to text: ↑1↑2↑3
4. FDIC bank-only financial reports, certificate 19629; June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025Official sourceBack to text: ↑
5. FDIC Quarterly glossary, fourth quarter 2019SourceBack to text: ↑
6. International Bancshares June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed August 6, 2026Filing / reportBack to text: ↑
7. International Bancshares 2025 annual-report financial exhibit, filed February 26, 2026Filing / reportBack to text: ↑1↑2
8. Federal Reserve minority-depository-institution annual report, May 15, 2026; 2024 inventoryFiling / reportBack to text: ↑
9. FDIC final prohibition decision, Martin Fernandez Jr., January 17, 2025Official source · PDFBack to text: ↑